Governance
Balancing Freebies and Welfare
- 10 Feb 2025
- 7 min read
For Prelims: Subsidies, RBI, Health Insurance, Purchasing Power, Public Distribution System (PDS), Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP), Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act, 2003, Off-budget Borrowings.
For Mains: Debate over freebies and welfare and their impact on the economy.
Why in News?
There is a rising trend among the political parties to promise a barrage of freebies or subsidies to lure the electorate as seen in the Delhi Assembly elections 2025.
- Electoral freebies (or "revdi culture") are debated—some see them as harmful to development, while others view them as essential for socio-economic progress.
- The RBI defines ‘freebies’ as “a public welfare measure that is provided free of charge.”
How Freebies Help in Socio-economic Progress?
- Women Empowerment: Cash transfers to women boost financial independence, decision-making, and reduce dependency on family members for immediate needs.
- Enhancing Human Capabilities: Welfare schemes like free food and health insurance align with Amartya Sen’s “capability approach,” enhancing dignity, immunity, and reducing healthcare burdens.
- Boosting Consumer Spending: Direct cash transfers boost demand, enhance purchasing power, and stimulate local economies through increased spending.
- Poverty Alleviation: Food security schemes, like the Public Distribution System (PDS) and Mid-Day Meal, ensure basic sustenance, preventing extreme poverty.
- Targeted welfare measures help bridge the gap between rich and poor, fostering inclusive growth.
- Long-Term Benefits: Poor health causes personal suffering and strains public resources by raising healthcare demand. Early investment in nutrition brings long-term benefits for individuals and society.
How Freebies Can Harmful for Development?
- Rising Revenue Deficit: Freebie-driven spending increases the fiscal burden, leading to a decline in the revenue surplus of States.
- E.g., Delhi’s revenue surplus dropped by 35% between 2022-23 and 2024-25.
- Higher Subsidy Expenditure: RBI warns that unchecked subsidies divert funds from infrastructure, healthcare, and education, with annual costs rising by Rs 10,000- 12,000 crore due to new freebies.
- Increased Tax Burden: Governments may raise taxes to cover rising government expenditure, potentially reducing disposable income and hurting middle-class consumption.
- Crowding Out Investments: Excessive expenditure on freebies could crowd out the resources available and hamper states’ capacity to build critical social and economic infrastructure.
- Potential Credit Default Risks: Worsening fiscal health affects states’ ability to borrow and higher debt servicing costs may increase credit default risks.
- It may not boost demand because people save more in the present, expecting future taxes to cover expenses on government borrowing (Ricardian Equivalence).
- Distort Decision Making: Some argue that freebies amount to bribery and discourage voters from making informed choices.
What is the Judicial Stand on Freebies?
- S. Subramaniam Balaji Case, 2013: The Supreme Court ruled that freebies fall within legislative policy and are beyond judicial scrutiny. It emphasized that certain freebies align with the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP).
- Expert Panel on Freebies: In 2022, a PIL claimed that freebies undermine free and fair elections, proposing an expert panel to gather stakeholder recommendations.
How Freebies Differ From Welfare Schemes?
Criteria |
Freebies |
Welfare Schemes |
Conceptual Distinction |
Goods or services provided free of charge, often for political gain. |
Government initiatives for social and economic upliftment. |
Merit vs. Non-Merit Goods |
Non-merit goods like TVs, laptops, mixer grinders, and cash handouts. |
Merit goods like education, healthcare, food security, and rural employment. |
Socio-Economic Impact |
Provides short-term benefits but lacks structural economic improvements. |
Reduces poverty, improves living standards, and enhances productivity. |
Fiscal Sustainability |
Can lead to excessive borrowing and revenue deficits. |
Budgeted with policy backing for economic inclusion. |
Political Motivations |
Often distributed before elections to influence voters. |
Aimed at structural development with long-term policy planning. |
Implementation Challenges |
Distributed indiscriminately, sometimes benefiting non-needy sections. |
Essential for addressing inequalities. |
Accountability and Governance |
Lacks transparency, leading to financial mismanagement. |
Subject to fiscal planning, coordination, and oversight. |
Note:
- Merit goods are goods and services that have positive externalities, meaning they benefit not just individuals but society as a whole. Education, Healthcare, Food Security etc.
- Demerit goods are goods and services whose consumption leaves a negative impact on its consumer and on others in the society. E.g., alcohol.
Way Forward
- Fiscal Reforms: Strengthen the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act, 2003 to prevent reckless fiscal spending.
- Implement time-bound and well-targeted subsidies to ensure sustainable social welfare.
- Defining Welfare and Freebies: Define policy guidelines to differentiate essential welfare from electoral freebies, using social utility, long-term impact, and fiscal sustainability as criteria.
- Strengthening Institutional Mechanisms: Strengthen financial regulators to monitor public spending and improve tracking of off-budget borrowings and hidden subsidies (e.g., Underpricing of electricity).
- Balancing Welfare and Fiscal Prudence: Focus on education, healthcare, and job creation for economic stability, ensuring subsidies and social schemes promote capacity-building over dependency.
Drishti Mains Question: Discuss the socio-economic impact of electoral freebies in India. How do they differ from welfare schemes? |