Biological Diversity (Amendment) Bill, 2021

Why in News

Recently, the Biological Diversity (Amendment) Bill, 2021 was tabled in the Parliament.

• The amendments seek to decriminalise certain provisions and bring more foreign investments in the chain of biological resources, including research, patent and commercial utilisation, without compromising the national interest.
• However, opposition parties have cited concerns over the bill and it is being referred to a select committee. They demanded the bill to be referred to the Parliament standing committee.

Key Points

• Objective: The bill looks to relax certain rules in the Biological Diversity Act, 2002.
  • The 2002 Act imposed a heavy “compliance burden” on Indian medicine practitioners, seed sector, industry & researchers and made it hard to conduct collaborative research and investments.
• Simplify Research Process: The amendments also streamline the process of Patenting for Indian researchers to encourage patenting.
  • For this, regional patenting centres will be opened across the country.
• Boosting Indian Medicine System: It seeks to give a fillip to “Indian system of medicine”, and facilitate fast-tracking of research, patent application process, transfer of research results while utilising the biological resources available in India.
  • It seeks to empower local communities to be able to utilise resources, particularly of medicinal value, such as seeds.
  • The Bill looks to encourage farmers to increase cultivation of medicinal plants.
  • These objectives to be achieved without compromising the objectives of the United Nation Convention on Biological Diversity.
• Decriminalising Certain Provisions: It seeks to decriminalise certain provisions in the chain of biological resources.
  • These changes were brought in consonance with India’s ratification of Nagoya Protocol (access to generic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilisation) in 2012.
• Allowing Foreign Investments: It also allows for foreign investment in research in biodiversity. However, this investment will necessarily have to be made through Indian companies involved in biodiversity research.
  • For foreign entities the approval from the National Biodiversity Authority is necessary.
• Exempting AYUSH Practitioners: The Bill seeks to exempt registered AYUSH medical practitioners and people accessing codified traditional knowledge, among others, from giving prior intimation to State biodiversity boards for accessing biological resources for certain purposes.

Concerns Raised by The Experts

• Trade over Conservation: It prioritises intellectual property and commercial trade at the expense of the act’s key aim of conserving biological resources.
• Threat of Bio-piracy: The exemptions to AYUSH Practitioners no longer need to take approvals, would pave the way for “bio piracy”.
  • Biopiracy is the practice of exploiting naturally occurring genetic or biochemical material in commerce.
• Marginalising Biodiversity Management Committees (BMCs): The proposed amendments allow for state biodiversity boards to represent BMCs to determine terms of benefit sharing,
  • Under the Biodiversity Act 2002, national and state biodiversity boards are required to consult the biodiversity management committees (constituted by every local body) while taking any decision relating to the use of biological resources.
• Sidelining Local Communities: The bill also exempts cultivated medicinal plants from the purview of the Act. However, it is practically impossible to detect which plants are cultivated and which are from the wild.
  • This provision could allow large companies to evade the requirement for prior approval or share the benefit with local communities under the access and benefit-sharing provisions of the Act.

Way Forward

• Effective Implementation of the Forest Rights Act (FRA): The government must make an effort to build trust between its agencies in the area and the people who depend on these forests by treating them as equal citizens like everyone else in the country..
  • The FRA’s loopholes have already been identified; all it needs is to work on amending it.
• Integration of International Treaties: The implementation of Nagoya Protocol cannot work in isolation and thus must be commensurate with other international treaties.
  • Therefore, integration between Nagoya Protocol and the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) need to consider the legislative, administrative and policy measures that cross each other’s path
• People’s Biodiversity Register (PBR): PBR should aim to document folk knowledge of status, uses, history, ongoing changes and forces driving changes in biodiversity resources, and people’s perceptions of how these resources should be managed.
  • PBRs can be useful to preserve the rights of farmers or communities over the traditional knowledge they may hold over a particular variety.

Source: IE

Right to Be Forgotten

Why in News

Recently, the Union Government informed the Delhi High Court that the international legal concept of the Right to Be Forgotten is evolving in India and it comes under the Right to Privacy.

• As per Supreme Court Judgement the Right to privacy includes the Right to Be Forgotten (RTBF) and the right to be left alone.

Key Points

• Right to Privacy: In Puttaswamy v. Union of India case, 2017, the Right to Privacy was declared a fundamental right by the Supreme Court.
  • Right to privacy is protected as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 and as a part of the freedoms guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution.
• Right to be Forgotten : It is the right to have publicly available personal information removed from the internet, search, databases, websites or any other public platforms, once the personal information in question is no longer necessary, or relevant.
  • The RTBF gained importance after the 2014 decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) in the Google Spain case.
  • In the Indian context, the Supreme Court in Puttaswamy v. Union of India, 2017 noted that the RTBF was a part of the broader right of privacy.
    • The RTBF emerges from the right to privacy under Article 21 and partly from the right to dignity under Article 21.
• Right to be Left Alone: It doesn’t mean that one is withdrawing from society. It is an expectation that society will not interfere in the choices made by the person so long as they do not cause harm to others.
• Issues Associated with RTBF:
  • Privacy vs. Information: The existence of RTBF in a given situation depends on its balancing with other conflicting rights such as the right to free expression or other publication rights.
    • For example, a person may want to de-link information about his criminal records and make it difficult for people to access certain journalistic reports when they google him.
    • This brings the person’s right to be left alone, derived from Article 21, directly in conflict with the rights of the media to report on issues, flowing from Article 19.
  • Enforceability Against Private Individuals: The RTBF will normally be claimed against a private party (a media or news website).
    • This raises the question of whether fundamental rights can be enforced against the private individual, which is generally enforceable against the state.
    • Only Article 15(2), Article 17 and Article 23 provides protection against a private act of a private party that is challenged based on its violation of the Constitution.
  • Ambiguous Judgements: In recent years, without a data protection law to codify RTBF, there are some inconsistent and peculiar adjudications of the right by various high courts.
    • Courts in India have repeatedly either accepted or rejected the application of RTBF while completely ignoring the wider constitutional questions associated with it.

Government Steps to Protect Privacy

• Personal Data Protection Bill 2019:
  • To provide for protection of privacy of individuals relating to their Personal Data and to establish a Data Protection Authority of India for the said purposes and the matters concerning the personal data of an individual.
  • Framed on the recommendations of B N Srikrishna Committee (2018).
• Information Technology Act, 2000:
  • Provides for safeguard against certain breaches in relation to data from computer systems. It contains provisions to prevent the unauthorised use of computers, computer systems and data stored therein.

Way Forward

• The Parliament and the Supreme Court should engage in a detailed analysis of RTBF and evolve a mechanism for balancing the conflicting rights of privacy and freedom of expression.
• In this digital age, data is a valuable resource that should not be left unregulated. In this context, the time is ripe for India to have a robust data protection regime.
  • Thus, the government should expedite the enactment of the Personal Data Protection Bill 2019.

Source: IE

Programme for Development of Semiconductors and Display Manufacturing Ecosystem

Why in News

Recently, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has approved a comprehensive Program for the Development of Semiconductors and Display Manufacturing Ecosystems in the country.

• The government proposes to provide incentives worth Rs 76,000 crore for the development of semiconductors and display manufacturing ecosystems over the next six years.

Key Points

• Incentives Under the Programme
  • Semiconductor Fabs and Display Fabs:
    • It would provide fiscal support of up to 50% of the project cost for setting up semiconductor and display fabrication units.
    • The Union government will work with the States to set up high-tech clusters with the required infrastructure such as land and semiconductor-grade water.
  • Semi-conductor Laboratory (SCL):
    • MeitY will take requisite steps for modernization and commercialization of Semi-conductor Laboratory (SCL).
    • MeitY will explore the possibility for the Joint Venture of SCL with a commercial fab partner to modernise the brownfield fab facility.
  • Compound Semiconductors:
    • It will support fiscal support of 30% of capital expenditure to approved units.
    • At Least 15 such units of Compound Semiconductors and Semiconductor Packaging are expected to be established with Government support under this scheme.
  • Semiconductor Design Companies:
    • The Design Linked Incentive (DLI) Scheme shall extend product design linked incentive of up to 50% of eligible expenditure and product deployment linked incentive of 6% - 4% on net sales for five years.
    • Support will be provided to 100 domestic companies of semiconductor design for Integrated Circuits (ICs), Chipsets, System on Chips (SoCs), Systems & IP Cores and semiconductor linked design.
  • India Semiconductor Mission:
    • In order to drive the long-term strategies for developing a sustainable semiconductors and display ecosystem, a specialised and independent India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) will be set up.
    • ISM will be led by global experts in the semiconductor and display industry. It will act as the nodal agency for efficient and smooth implementation of the schemes on Semiconductors and Display ecosystem.
  • Production Linked Incentives:
    • Incentive support to the tune of Rs.55,392 crore (7.5 billion USD) have been approved under PLI for Largest Scale Electronics Manufacturing, PLI for IT Hardware, SPECS Scheme and Modified Electronics Manufacturing Clusters (EMC 2.0) Scheme.
    • In addition, PLI incentives to the quantum of Rs.98,000 crore (USD 13 billion) are approved for allied sectors comprising ACC battery, auto components, telecom & networking products, solar PV modules and white goods.
• Significance:
  • Strategic Importance: In the current geopolitical scenario, trusted sources of semiconductors and displays hold strategic importance and are key to the security of critical information infrastructure.
  • Employment: It will also create highly skilled employment opportunities to harness the demographic dividend of the country.
  • Multiplier Effect: Development of the semiconductor and display ecosystem will have a multiplier effect across different sectors of the economy with deeper integration to the global value chain.
  • Boost to Electronic Sector: The program will usher in a new era in electronics manufacturing by providing a globally competitive incentive package to companies in semiconductors and display manufacturing as well as design.
  • Self Reliance: This shall pave the way for India’s technological leadership in these areas of strategic importance and economic self-reliance.

Indian Electronic Sector

• About:
  • The Indian electronics sector is tremendously growing with the demand expected to cross USD 400 billion by 2023-24.
  • Domestic production has grown from USD 29 billion in 2014-15 to nearly USD 70 billion in 2019-20 (Compounded Annual Growth Rate of 25%).
  • Most of this production takes place in the final assembly units (last-mile industries) located in India and focussing on them will help develop deep backward linkages, thus inducing industrialisation.
• Need:
  • National Security Considerations:
    • Most of the chips, as well as components used in Indian communication and critical systems, are imported.
    • This could hamper national security and sovereignty as backdoors could be programmed in chips during manufacturing, which could compromise networks and cyber-security.
  • Increasing Imports:
    • It is expected that electronics imports will soon overtake crude oil as India’s largest import commodity which will result in assembly units ending up as little more than mere packaging units.
  • Increased Demand and Shortage Amid Covid:
    • The Covid-19 pandemic and the subsequent lockdowns across the world that forced shut crucial chip-making facilities in countries including Japan, South Korea, China and the US.
    • Its shortage causes cascading effects, given that the first one creates pent-up demand that becomes the cause for the follow-up famine.
  • Profiting from Anti-Chinese Sentiments:
    • Due to the USA’s allegations on China for worsening Covid-19 and India-China conflict and recent developments as a result of it, numerous multinational companies (MNCs) are shifting their production out of China.
  • Pushing Make in India:
    • There is a need to promote semiconductor manufacturing alongside assembly units in India.
    • This will induce greater local production of components and also fuel the growth of the industry as a whole, making Make in India successful.
    • In 2019, the Union Cabinet gave its approval to the National Policy on Electronics 2019 which envisions positioning India as a global hub for Electronics System Design and Manufacturing.
• Challenges:
  • Missing Profits:
    • Despite the impressive growth of electronic production in India, the net value added by production units is very low.
    • The net value addition ranges between 5% and 15%, as most components are imported rather than locally sourced.
    • It implies that local value addition is a mere USD 7-10 billion out of a global market of USD 2.1 trillion.
  • Limited Indigenous Capability in Upstream Industries:
    • In the era of global supply chains, the value addition at the final stages of production is very low, especially in electronics because the more complicated processes, involving greater value addition, occur prior to assembly, in ‘upstream’ industries.
    • These include the production of processors, display panels, memory chips, cameras, etc.
  • Absence of Foundries:
    • In the absence of foundries (semiconductor fabrication plants where microchips are produced), India has to rely on foreign contractors to produce microchips.
    • Set-up of Foundries requires massive capital expenditure to the tune of USD 2 billion and more.
      • Foundries are also required to adopt newer technologies and processes almost every 18 months to ensure competitiveness which means high capital depreciation and often accounts for 50-60% of the production cost.

Way Forward

• Semiconductors and displays are the foundation of modern electronics driving the next phase of digital transformation under Industry 4.0.
• The new mission should focus fiscal support, at least for now, on other parts of the chip-making chain including design centres, testing facilities, packaging etc.
  • The total outlay of Scheme for Promotion of Manufacturing of Electronic Components and Semiconductors (SPECS) must be increased from the current Rs. 3300 crore, to attract the microchip giants.
• India’s PSEs such as Bharat Electronics Ltd or Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd can be used to set up a semiconductor fab foundry with the help of a global major.
• India needs to drop the dream of swadeshi semiconductors. Instead, it should aim to become a key player in a trusted, plurilateral semiconductor ecosystem that keeps key adversaries out.
  • Favourable trade policies are critical for building a plurilateral semiconductor ecosystem.

Source: PIB

India and Vietnam Relation

Why in News

Recently, India and Vietnam signed a letter of intent (LOI) to collaborate in the field of digital media, paving the way for further strengthening the partnership between the two countries.

• A LOI is a document that declares the initial commitment of two parties as they enter into a business deal with each other. It outlines the chief terms of the prospective deal.
• Earlier in 2020, Defence Ministers of India and Vietnam discussed collaboration in defence industry capability building, training and cooperation in United Nations (UN) peacekeeping operations, etc.

Key Points

• Letter of Intent: It recognises the joint objectives of both the countries to facilitate cooperation in the field of Posts and Telecom.
  • Promote sharing of information and experience, cooperate to implement projects in Human Resource Development.
  • Promote enhanced cooperation of postal designated operators and service providers of both the countries.
  • It will shape bilateral cooperation in the field of new technologies and challenges, such as the ‘infodemic’, which all countries are grappling with during the COVID-19 pandemic.
• Scope of Discussion: Vietnam appreciated the efforts of India for developing indigenous 5G network under “AtmaNirbhar Bharat”.
  • The Vietnamese Minister of Information and Communications suggested that India should collaborate in the field of 5G to produce world class India has been developing indigenously designed 5G telecom equipment.

India- Vietnam Relation

• Background:
  • While defence cooperation has been one of the most significant pillars of the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership initiated by the two countries in 2016, the relationship between the two countries was established much earlier.
  • India had established the Consul General’s office in Hanoi as early as 1956.
    • Vietnam established its diplomatic mission in 1972.
  • India had stood by Vietnam in opposing US intervention in that country at the cost of embittering Indo-US relations.
  • The relationship was further strengthened when India, in the early 1990s, initiated its “Look East Policy” with the specific objective of economic integration and political cooperation with Southeast Asia and East Asia.
• Areas of Cooperation:
  • Strategic Partnership:
    • India and Vietnam agreed to strengthen their strategic partnership “in line with India’s Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative (IPOI) and the ASEAN’s Outlook on Indo-Pacific to achieve shared security, prosperity and growth for all in the region.”
  • Economic Cooperation:
    • Trade and economic relations for mutual benefit, which have significantly improved over the years particularly after the ASEAN- India Free Trade Agreement was signed.
    • India realises that Vietnam is a potential regional power in South East Asia with great political stability and substantial economic growth.
    • India is investing in development and capacity assistance for Vietnam through quick impact projects (QIP), proposals in the area of water resource management in Vietnam’s Mekong Delta region, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and digital connectivity.
  • Trade relations:
    • During the Financial Year (FY) April 2020 – March 2021, bilateral trade between India and Vietnam reached USD 11.12 billion.
      • Indian exports to Vietnam amounting to USD 4.99 billion and Indian imports from Vietnam at USD 6.12 billion.
  • Defence Cooperation:
    • While Vietnam is interested in modernising its armed forces, India is interested in developing defence capabilities of its South-East Asian partners sufficiently to maintain peace in the strategic region.
    • Vietnam is interested in India’s Akash surface-to-air systems and Dhruv advanced light helicopters and Brahmos missiles.
    • Apart from this, the defence relations include capacity building, dealing with common security concerns, training of personnel, and cooperation in defence R&D.
    • Both countries reaffirmed the strong India-Vietnam Defence cooperation which is a key pillar of Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (2016).
      • This year completes five years of “Comprehensive Strategic Partnership” between India and Vietnam, and the year 2022 will mark fifty years of diplomatic relations between the two countries
    • Indian Naval Ship INS Kiltan undertook a visit to Ho Chi Minh City to deliver flood relief materials for the people of Central Vietnam.
      • It also participated in the PASSEX Exercise with the Vietnam People’s Navy.
    • The China factor also weighs heavily in the respective strategic calculus of India and Vietnam.
      • Both countries had fought wars with China and both have border problems with that country. China aggressively continues to encroach in the territories of the two countries.
      • Hence, it is natural for both the countries to come closer with a view to restrain China from its aggressive actions.
  • Cooperation at Multiple Fora:
    • At the UN Security Council, both India and Vietnam are serving concurrently as non-permanent members in 2021.
    • India and Vietnam closely cooperate in various regional forums such as East Asia Summit, Mekong Ganga Cooperation, Asia Europe Meeting (ASEM).
  • People-to-People Contacts:
    • The year 2019 was celebrated as the ASEAN-India Year of Tourism. Both countries have facilitated a simplified visa regime to promote bilateral tourism.
    • The Embassy of India organised various events to celebrate Mahatma@150 in 2018-19. These include Jaipur artificial limb fitment camps, which were organised in four provinces of Vietnam, benefitting 1000 people, under the ‘India for Humanity’ initiative of the Government of India.

Way Forward

• In 2016, the first time in 15 years, an Indian Prime Minister visited Vietnam signalling India is no longer hesitant to expand its presence in China’s periphery.
• India's foreign policy envisages India to play an anchor for peace, prosperity and stability in Asia and Africa, deepening ties with Vietnam will only strengthen this narrative.
• As India and Vietnam geographically lie at the heart of the emerging Indo-Pacific construct, both would play a major role in this strategic space which is becoming a core theatre for competition for power and influence amongst the major powers.
• The strategic partnership under the broad India-Vietnam cooperation framework would be critical towards building the vision laid out under India’s ‘Act East’ Policy, which looks to expand engagement that is mutually positive and which ensures inclusive growth for all in the region.
• Strengthening ties with Vietnam will eventually lead a step towards the realisation of SAGAR (Security and Growth all in the region) initiative as hailed by the Indian PM.
• India and Vietnam both can mutually benefit each other in the arena of Blue Economy and ocean security.

Source: PIB

Proposal on Algo Trading: SEBI

Why in News

Recently, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has issued a discussion paper on regulating Algorithmic or Algo Trading, or trades generated out of automatic execution and logic.

Key Points

• SEBI’s Proposal:
  • Regulating Framework: There is a need to create a regulatory framework for algo trading.
  • Algo-Order: All orders emanating from an APIs (Application Programming Interface), should be treated as an algo order and be subject to control by stock broker and the APIs to carry out algo trading should be tagged with the unique algo ID provided by the stock exchange granting approval for the algo.
    • An API is an interface that can be used to program software that interacts with an existing application.
  • Exchange Approval: Each algo strategy, whether used by broker or client, has to be approved by exchange and as is the current practice, each algo strategy has to be certified by Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA)/ Diploma in Information System Audit (DISA) auditors.
  • Algo-ID: Stock exchanges have to develop a system to ensure that only those algos which are approved by the exchange and having unique algo ID provided by the Exchange are being deployed.
  • Broker to Control Client Orders: All algos developed by any entity have to run on the servers of brokers wherein the broker has control of client orders, order confirmations and margin information.
  • Authentication: Two factor authentication should be built in every such system which provides access to an investor for any API/algo trade.
• SEBI’s Concern:
  • Risk To Market: Unregulated and unapproved algos pose a risk to the market and can be misused for systematic market manipulation as well as to lure the retail investors by guaranteeing them higher returns.
  • Identity Issue: Currently, exchanges approve algos submitted by brokers. However, for algos deployed by retail investors using APIs neither the exchanges nor the brokers can identify if a trade emanating from the API link is an algo or a non-algo trade.
  • No Redressal Mechanism: Potential losses in case of a failed algo strategy could be huge for retail investors since third-party algo providers are unregulated and there is no investor grievance redressal mechanism in place.
• Significance:
  • Protection of Retail Investors: It will ensure that the interest of retail investors is protected and it will boost investors’ confidence to undertake algo trading.
  • Curb on Price Manipulation: With a set of rules in place, there won’t be any price manipulations and the investors will not incur any heavy losses in the process.
  • Empowerment of Brokers: Additionally, it might be a blessing in disguise for brokers to scale up their technological prowess and expand their clientele.
• Market Concerns:
  • Makes Process Tedious: Algo trading will deepen the stock markets and aid retail investors who are not full-time engaged in stock trading. However, as getting the requisite permission from the stock exchanges is a tedious process, brokers may have to stop using the API system.
  • Negatively Impact Development of Market: There’s a chance that investors might shift to some other system if API is not allowed, putting restrictions will impact development of the market.

Way Forward

• Regulations govern and work towards eliminating any threats to that particular market. But in doing so, it has to often stifle innovation and keep checks in place to avoid malpractices or misuse.
• It is essential that regulators are well versed in the operation of algorithms and have the flexibility to be able to engage in new legislation where required.

Source: IE

Chalcolithic Culture in Central India

Why in News

Recently, Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) carried out excavations at two prominent sites of Chalcolithic affiliations in Central India (Eran, district Sagar and at Tewar, district Jabalpur) in the state of Madhya Pradesh.

Key Points

• Chalcolithic Culture:
  • About: The end of the Neolithic period saw the use of metals. Several cultures were based on the use of copper and stone implements.
    • Such a culture is called Chalcolithic and as the name indicates, during the Chalcolithic (Chalco = Copper and Lithic = Stone) period, both metal and stone were utilised for the manufacture of the equipment in day-to-day life.
    • The Chalcolithic cultures followed the Bronze Age Harappa culture.
    • It spanned around 2500 BC to 700 BC.
  • Salient Features: The Chalcolithic culture of a region was defined according to certain salient features seen in ceramics and other cultural equipment like copper artefacts, beads of semi-precious stones, stone tools and terracotta figurines.
  • Characteristics:
    • Rural Settlements: The people were mostly rural and lived near hills and rivers.
      • The people of Chalcolithic Age survived on hunting, fishing, and farming
    • Regional Differences: Regional differences in social structure, cereals and pottery become visible.
    • Migration: Migration and diffusion of population groups were often cited as causes for the origin of different cultures within the Chalcolithic period.
    • First Metal Age of India: Since this was the first metal age, copper and its alloy bronze which melt at low temperature were used for the manufacture of various objects during this period.
    • Art and Craft: The specialty of the Chalcolithic culture was wheel made pottery mostly of red and orange colour.
      • Different types of pottery were used by the people of the Chalcolithic phase. The Black-and-Red pottery among them was quite common.
      • The Ochre-Coloured Pottery(OCP) was also in use.

• Excavation at Eran during 2020-21:
  • Eran (ancient Airikina) is situated on the left bank of the Bina (ancient Venva) river and surrounded by it on three sides.
    • Bina river is a river that flows in Madhya Pradesh state of India. It is a chief tributary of the Betwa river, which is itself a tributary of the Yamuna river.
  • Eran is located 75 km north-west from Sagar district headquarter.
  • The recent excavation at this site, during 2020-21, has unearthed a variety of antiquities including a copper coin, an iron arrowhead, terracotta bead, stone beads along with a copper coins, stone celt, beads of steatite and jasper, glass, carnelian, terracotta wheel, animal figurines, miniature pots, iron objects, stone querns, pestles and a red slipped terracotta with inscription in Devnagari.
  • The occurrence of few specimens of plain, thin grey ware is noteworthy.
  • The use of iron was evidenced by few metallic objects at the site.
  • This excavation at the site also revealed the remains of Chalcolithic culture with four major periods i.e.
    • Period I: Chalcolithic (18^th -7^th BCE),
    • Period II: Early historic (7^th– 2^nd century BCE & 2^nd century BCE – 1st century CE),
    • Period III: 1^st – 6^th century CE
    • Period IV: late mediaeval (16^th – 18^th century CE).
• Excavation at Tewar during 2020-21:
  • Tewar (Tripuri) village is located 12 km west of Jabalpur district on Jabalpur – Bhopal highway.
  • This excavation revealed four folds of cultural sequences i.e. Kushana, Shunga, Satavahana, and Kalachuri.
  • Antiquarian remains in this excavation include viz remains of sculptures, hopscotch, terracotta balls, Iron nails, copper coins, terracotta beads, implements of Iron and terracotta figurine, in ceramics red ware, black ware, red slipped ware with shapes of handi, bowl, spouted pot, small pot, big jar, etc., structural remains consist of brick wall and structure of sandstone columns.

Source: PIB