Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Dispute | 12 Dec 2024
Why in News?
A Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna is set to hear the case on Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute in Mathura.
- It is among the oldest temple-mosque conflicts in India, with Hindus seeking to reclaim places of worship they allege were converted into mosques during invasions by Muslim rulers.
Key Points
- Background of the Dispute:
- Mathura, considered the birthplace of Lord Krishna, had a temple built in 1618.
- The Hindu side alleges that the temple was demolished in 1670 by Mughal ruler Aurangzeb to construct the Shahi Idgah Mosque.
- The Hindu side claims the mosque contains Hindu religious symbols and features, including a lotus-shaped pillar and an image of the deity Sheshnag.
- Also contends that the mosque was built on a part of the 13.37-acre land belonging to the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust and has filed a suit seeking the mosque’s relocation.
- The Shahi Idgah Mosque Committee and the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board argue that the mosque does not stand on disputed land.
- Key Developments:
- Court-Monitored Survey:
- On 14th December 2023, the Allahabad High Court ordered a court-monitored survey of the Shahi Idgah Mosque.
- The court appointed a commissioner to oversee the survey, based on claims that signs of the site’s past as a Hindu temple exist on the mosque premises.
- Supreme Court Intervention:
- The Committee of Management, Trust Shahi Masjid Idgah, filed a petition challenging the High Court’s order for the survey.
- On 16th January 2024, the Supreme Court stayed the High Court’s order for the survey, citing vagueness in the Hindu side’s application.
- Court-Monitored Survey:
- Arguments:
- Hindu Side’s Position:
- They demanded that the High Court conduct an original trial, similar to the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi case.
- The Hindu side has urged the Supreme Court to allow the High Court to determine the modalities for the commission survey.
- Mosque Committee’s Position:
- The committee argues that the High Court’s order for a survey is invalid as the suit is barred under the Places of Worship Act, 1991 which prevents changes to the character of religious places as of 15th August 1947.
- The committee has also challenged the High Court’s 26th May 2023, order transferring all dispute-related cases from the Mathura court to itself.
- Hindu Side’s Position: