Day 58: Examine the concept of parliamentary sovereignty in India. How does it differ from the British model of parliamentary sovereignty? (150 words)
06 Feb 2025 | GS Paper 2 | Polity & Governance
Approach
|
Parliamentary sovereignty refers to the supreme legislative authority of Parliament to make or unmake any law. In the UK, Parliament is truly sovereign, whereas in India, parliamentary sovereignty is limited by the Constitution, federalism, and judicial review.
Parliamentary Sovereignty in India:
How Indian Parliamentary Sovereignty Differs from Britain:
Feature | India | Britain |
Source of Power | Constitution (Supreme) | Parliament (Supreme) |
Judicial Review | Exists (Article 13, Article 32, Article 226 and Article 141 etc) | No judicial review (Parliament is supreme) |
Basic Structure | Cannot be amended (Kesavananda Bharati case) | Can amend any law, including constitutional laws |
Federalism | Division of powers (Union & State Lists) | Unitary system, no division of powers |
Fundamental Rights | Parliament cannot violate them (Article 13) | No entrenched fundamental rights |
Executive Authority | Limited by parliamentary system & judicial review | Executive is completely accountable to Parliament |
Unlike the UK, where Parliament is sovereign, India follows constitutional sovereignty, ensuring checks and balances through judicial review, federalism, and fundamental rights. This prevents majoritarian rule and safeguards democracy, making Indian parliamentary sovereignty limited yet functional in a constitutional framework.