Arunachal Pradesh and Assam Border Dispute
For Prelims: Assam-Arunachal Pradesh border dispute, Article 263 of the Constitution
For Mains: Northeast border disputes and related issues and way ahead
Why in News?
Recently, the Governments of Arunachal Pradesh and Assam have decided to form district-level committees for resolving boundary disputes.
- The district committees will undertake joint surveys in the disputed areas to find tangible solutions to the long-pending issue based on historical perspective, ethnicity, contiguity, peoples’ will and administrative convenience of both states.
What are the Border Disputes in the Country?
Assam-Arunachal Pradesh: |
|
Assam-Mizoram: |
|
Assam-Nagaland: |
|
Assam-Meghalaya: |
|
Haryana-Himachal Pradesh: |
|
Ladakh-Himachal Pradesh: |
|
Maharashtra-Karnataka: |
|
Why do inter-state border disputes remain unresolved?
- Linguistic Idea of Reorganization: Although the States Reorganization Commission, 1956 was based on administrative convenience, states reorganized largely resembled the idea of one language one state.
- Geographical Complexity: The other complexity has been terrain — rivers, hills and forests straddle two states in many places and borders cannot be physically marked.
- Colonial maps had left out large tracts of the northeast outside Assam as “thick forests” or marked them “unexplored”.
- Indigenous Communities: Indigenous communities were, for the most part, left alone. Boundaries would be drawn for administrative convenience when the “need” arose.
- The 1956 demarcation did not resolve the discrepancies.
- When new states were carved out of Assam (Nagaland in 1963, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Tripura and Manipur in 1972, and Arunachal Pradesh in 1987), it was still not addressed.
Way Forward
- Boundary disputes between the states can be settled by using satellite mapping of the actual border locations.
- Reviving the Inter-state council can be an option for resolution of an Inter-state dispute.
- Under Article 263 of the Constitution, the Inter-state council is expected to inquire and advise on disputes, discuss subjects common to all states and make recommendations for better policy coordination.
- Similarly, Zonal councils need to be revived to discuss the matters of common concern to states in each zone—matters relating to social and economic planning, border disputes, inter-state transport, etc.
- India is the epitome of unity in diversity. However, to strengthen this unity furthermore, both the centre and state governments need to imbibe the ethos of cooperative federalism.
UPSC Civil Services Examination, Previous Year Questions (PYQs)
Q. Which was the Capital of Andhra State when it was made a separate State in the year 1953? (2008)
(a) Guntur
(b) Kurnool
(c) Nellore
(d) Warangal
Ans: (b)
- In 1953, following the death of Potti Sreeramulu (popularly called as Amarajeevi) due to fast unto death, Andhra State was carved out of Madras Presidency on linguistic basis with grouping of Telugu-speaking northern districts – Rayalaseema and Coastal Andhra, but it was only in 1956 that present-day Telangana was merged in Andhra Pradesh. Andhra Pradesh became the first State to be constituted under the State Reorganisation Act, 1956.
- Kurnool was the capital of Andhra State; and in 1956, Hyderabad was made capital of Andhra Pradesh.