Noida | IAS GS Foundation Course | date 09 January | 6 PM Call Us
This just in:

State PCS



Mains Practice Questions

  • Q ."Cooperative federalism is giving way to competitive federalism, while collaborative federalism remains an aspiration." Analyze this evolution with special reference to the changing nature of Centre-State relations. (250 words)

    11 Feb, 2025 GS Paper 2 Polity & Governance

    Approach

    • Introduce the answer by briefing about the shifting nature of Federalism in India
    • Give arguments supporting the Changing Nature of Centre-State Relations
    • Suggest Measures for Strengthening Collaborative Federalism
    • Conclude with a forward looking approach.

    Introduction

    The Constitution envisions a "Union of States", blending unitary and federal features. And, federalism in India is a dynamic process, shaped by historical, economic, and political factors.

    Body

    Changing Nature of Centre-State Relations:

    • Cooperative Federalism:
      • Concept: A structured, policy-driven approach where the Centre and States work together towards shared national goals through coordinated planning and financial transfers.
      • Key Features:
        • Centralized Planning through the Planning Commission (1950-2014).
        • Fixed mechanisms for policy coordination, such as the National Development Council (1952-2014).
      • Examples:
        • Green Revolution (1960s-70s): Centre-State collaboration on agricultural development.
        • Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (2001): A centrally sponsored scheme for education, implemented with State involvement.
      • Challenges:
        • Over-centralization limited States’ autonomy.
        • Rigid funding structures, leading to inefficiencies.
        • Politicization of financial allocations, favoring ruling-party States.
    • Competitive Federalism:
      • Concept: States actively compete for economic resources, investments, reducing dependency on the Centre and fostering efficiency.
      • Drivers of Change:
        • Economic Liberalization (1991) led to decentralized economic decision-making.
        • Dismantling of the Planning Commission (2014) reduced central economic planning, emphasizing State-led growth.
        • 14th Finance Commission (2015) increased States’ share in central taxes from 32% to 42%, giving them more financial autonomy. (though later reduced to 41% by 15th Finance Commission )
          • Also, 15th Finance Commission of India (FC) gave 2.5% weight to tax effort when allocating grants to states
      • Examples:
        • Aspirational Districts Programme (2018): Performance-based funding to improve socio-economic indicators.
        • UDAY Scheme (2015): Competitive model for States to reform the power sector.
      • Concerns:
        • Regional Disparities: Wealthier States attract more investment, leaving poorer States behind.
          • Fiscal Stress: States with weaker revenue bases struggle to compete.
        • Over-reliance on Market Forces, leading to potential neglect of social welfare objectives.
    • Collaborative Federalism: A Vision in Progress
      • Concept: Unlike cooperative federalism (which is structured and coordinated by the Centre), collaborative federalism is more flexible, involving voluntary participation, best practice sharing, and co-development of policies among States and between the Centre and States.
      • Attempts at Collaboration:
        • GST Council (2017): A structured platform for joint tax policy making between the Centre and States.
        • State-Led Initiatives: Indira Sagar Polavaram Project envisages transfer of 80 TMC of surplus water of Godavari river to Krishna river to be shared between Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra
      • Challenges Hindering Collaboration:
        • Centralization of Decision-Making:
          • NEET Examination Policy: Imposed uniform standards despite opposition from some States.
        • Fiscal Imbalances:
          • GST Compensation Delays (post-2020) strained State finances..

    Measures for Strengthening Collaborative Federalism:

    • Institutional Strengthening:
      • Revamp Inter-State Council (Article 263) as an active dispute resolution body.
      • Strengthen Finance Commission’s role to ensure fair fiscal distribution.
        • Empower State Finance Commissions for better local governance.
    • Balanced Fiscal Devolution:
      • Ensure timely GST compensation to States.
      • Reduce Centre’s discretionary grants and cesses, giving States greater financial independence.
    • Encouraging Voluntary Collaboration:
      • Establish State-driven policy networks to exchange best practices (e.g., sustainable urban development, digital governance).
      • Promote regional economic cooperation (e.g., eastern and northeastern States working together for industrial corridors).
    • Consensus-Based Decision Making:
      • NITI Aayog should facilitate policy consensus, not just rank States.
      • Encourage co-legislation models where both Centre and States draft key national policies.

    Conclusion

    A truly balanced federal structure requires institutional strengthening, financial autonomy for States, and mechanisms for voluntary collaboration. By fostering a trust-based Centre-State relationship, India can ensure that federalism remains a force for inclusive growth, good governance, and national development as "Strong States make a strong nation",

    To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.

    Print PDF
close
SMS Alerts
Share Page
images-2
images-2