Noida | IAS GS Foundation Course | date 09 January | 6 PM Call Us
This just in:

State PCS



Mains Practice Questions

  • Q. Analyze the potential long-term consequences of eroding non-partisanship in public institutions. How does this impact democratic governance and public trust? (150 words)

    05 Dec, 2024 GS Paper 4 Theoretical Questions

    Approach:

    • Introduce the answer by highlighting the significance of Non-partisanship in public institutions
    • Delve into Consequences of Eroding Non-Partisanship
    • Highlight its Impact on Democratic Governance and Public Trust
    • Conclude suitably.

    Introduction:

    Non-partisanship in public institutions ensures impartiality and adherence to constitutional values over political or ideological leanings. It is vital for maintaining the credibility, independence, and integrity of institutions in a democracy.

    • Its erosion can compromise governance quality, deepen public distrust, and weaken democratic structures.

    Body:

    Consequences of Eroding Non-Partisanship

    • Undermining Institutional Integrity: Public institutions lose their ability to function impartially when influenced by political bias.
      • Example: Frequent transfers of civil servants for political reasons erode their autonomy and effectiveness in decision-making.
    • Weakening Rule of Law: A partisan approach may lead to selective application of laws, undermining the principle of equality before the law.
      • Example: Law enforcement agencies accused of targeting opposition leaders can create perceptions of vendetta, weakening faith in justice.
    • Erosion of Checks and Balance: Institutions such as the judiciary, Election Commission, and CAG play a critical role in holding the government accountable.
      • Politicization can dilute their role as independent watchdogs.
      • Example: Allegations of bias in electoral reforms or judicial appointments harm their credibility.
    • Decline in Professionalism: Merit and competency take a backseat to political loyalty, reducing administrative efficiency and innovation.
      • Example: Partisan favoritism in appointments to public offices, like regulatory bodies or universities, can lead to inefficiency and mediocrity.
    • Entrenchment of Cronyism and Corruption: Politicized institutions become tools for rewarding political loyalty rather than upholding public welfare, increasing corruption.
      • Example: Public sector undertakings suffering from political interference may prioritize vested interests over performance or accountability.

    Impact on Democratic Governance and Public Trust

    • Weakening of Democratic Norms: Partisan behavior undermines principles like transparency, accountability, and fairness.
    • Polarization of Society: Non-partisan institutions act as mediators. Their erosion exacerbates divisions, fueling political and social tensions.
    • Compromised Policy Continuity: Politicization results in frequent policy reversals, leading to uncertainty and inefficiency in governance.
    • Reduced Civic Participation: Loss of faith in institutions discourages public engagement in democratic processes.
    • International Reputation: Weak institutional integrity impacts the country’s global standing in indices like the Corruption Perception Index.

    Conclusion:

    The erosion of non-partisanship in public institutions is a significant threat to democratic governance and public trust. It compromises institutional integrity, undermines the rule of law, and fuels societal polarization, with long-term consequences for governance quality and national cohesion.

    To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.

    Print PDF
close
SMS Alerts
Share Page
images-2
images-2