- Filter By :
- Theoretical Questions
- Case Studies
-
Q. Discuss the ethical theories of utilitarianism and deontology. How do these theories differ in their approach to decision-making? (150 words)
06 Jun, 2024 GS Paper 4 Theoretical QuestionsApproach
- Introduce by giving a background to emergence of utilitarianism and deontology
- Give ethical theories of utilitarianism and deontology
- Mention key difference in their approaches
- Conclude in a balanced manner.
Introduction
In moral philosophy, the quest to determine what constitutes right and wrong has led to the development of various ethical frameworks.
- Among these, utilitarianism and deontology stand out as two of the most influential and widely debated theories.
- Both offer distinct lenses through which to view moral dilemmas
Body
Ethical Theories of Utilitarianism and Deontology
- Utilitarianism:
- Ethical Theory: Utilitarianism, championed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, emphasizes maximizing overall happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people.
- Example: Consider a policy decision to demolish a historic building to create affordable housing for a large number of citizens.
- A utilitarian would likely support this action despite the loss of a cultural landmark, as it benefits a greater number of people.
- Deontology:
- Ethical Theory: Deontology, with Immanuel Kant as its prominent figure, focuses on the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions, regardless of the consequences.
- In this case, certain moral duties and principles are considered absolute and universal.
- Example: A situation where a government official can secure a crucial economic deal by bribing a foreign official.
- Despite the potential benefits for the nation's economy, a deontologist would object to bribery as it violates the principle of honesty.
- Ethical Theory: Deontology, with Immanuel Kant as its prominent figure, focuses on the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions, regardless of the consequences.
Key Difference in their Approaches:
Aspect Utilitarianism Deontology Focus Consequences of actions Adherence to moral rules or duties Decision Basis Outcomes and overall welfare Intentions and adherence to moral laws Flexibility High; actions judged by results Low; actions judged by conformity to rules Key Question "What leads to the best outcome?" "What is my moral duty?" Main Criticism Can justify unethical means for good ends Can lead to rigid, impractical decisions Application Often in public policy, economics Often in personal ethics, human rights Conclusion
In the complexity of real-life ethical dilemmas, a nuanced understanding of both theories is valuable. Effective moral reasoning often requires balancing the deontological respect for duties and rights with the utilitarian consideration of outcomes and overall well-being.
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.
Print PDF