Mercy Petition | 22 Jun 2024

Source: IE

Why in News?

Recently, the President of India has denied the mercy petition of a Pakistani national sentenced to death for the 2000 Red Fort terrorist attack.

What is Mercy Petition?

• About:
  • A mercy petition is a formal request made by someone who has been sentenced to death or imprisonment seeking mercy from the President or the Governor, as the case may be.
  • The idea of Mercy Petition is followed in many countries like the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Canada, and India.
  • Everyone has the basic right to live. It is also mentioned as a fundamental right mentioned under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
• Philosophy behind: The philosophy behind the pardoning powers in India is rooted in the recognition that no judicial system is infallible and the need for a mechanism to rectify potential judicial errors.
  • Rectification of Judicial Errors: This safeguard acts as a corrective measure against potential miscarriages of justice.
    • For example, in 2012, 14 judges from the Supreme Court and High Courts, in separate letters to the President of India, highlighted cases from the 1990s where courts had wrongfully awarded capital punishment to 15 individuals, two of whom were subsequently executed.
  • Maintaining Public Trust: One of the core objectives of the pardoning power is to uphold and maintain the trust of the common man in the criminal justice system.
• Constitutional Framework:
  • As per the Constitutional framework in India, a mercy petition to the President is the last constitutional resort a convict can take when he is sentenced by a court of law. A convict can present a mercy petition to the President of India under Article 72 of the Constitution of India.
  • Similarly, the power to grant pardon is conferred upon the Governors of States under Article 161 of the Constitution of India.

• Process of making a Mercy Petition:
  • There is no statutory written procedure for dealing with mercy petitions, but in practice, after extinguishing all the reliefs in the court of law, either the convict in person or his relative on his behalf may submit a written petition to the President.
  • The petitions are received by the President’s secretariat on behalf of the President, which is then forwarded to the Ministry of Home Affairs for their comments and recommendations.
• Grounds for filing Mercy Petition:
  • The mercy or clemency is granted on the grounds based on his health, physical or mental fitness, and his family's financial conditions considering if he is the only sole earner of bread or butter or not.
    • The Supreme Court in cases such as Shatrughna Chauhan vs Union of India (2014) held that Right to seek for mercy under Article 72/161 of the Constitution is a constitutional right and not at the discretion or whims of the executive.
• Judicial Review:
  • SC in several cases such as Maruram vs UoI, Epuru Sudhakar vs State of Andhra Pradesh, and Kehar Singh vs UoI has stated that judicial review of the exercise of pardoning power is possible but on the limited ground.
  • The court has stated the following provision for judicial review of clemency power:
    • Powers have been exercised without application of mind
    • Exercised with Malafide intentions
    • Relevant material was kept out of consideration

What are some of the Important Judgments Related to Mercy Petition?

• Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab: In 1980, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty, but established important guardrails. “Judges”, the court said, “should never be bloodthirsty”, and the death penalty should not be awarded “save in the rarest of rare cases when the alternative option is unquestionably foreclosed”, and all possible mitigating circumstances have been considered.
  • The court has reaffirmed the “rarest of rare” standard in several decisions since then.
• Maru Ram v. Union of India (1981): The SC held that the power to grant pardon under Article 72 is to be exercised on the advice of the Council of ministers.
• Kehar Singh v. Union of India (1989): The SC had examined the scope of the President’s pardoning power under Article 72 in detail.
  • In the Kehar Singh case, the court stated that the convict does not have the right to an oral hearing to mercy petition.
• Shatrugan Chauhan v. State of U.P. (2014): In this judgement the SC held that inordinate delays in deciding mercy petitions can lead courts to commute death sentences.
• Law Commission Report: The Report of the 262nd Law Commission published in 2015 recommended the “absolute abolition” of the death penalty “for all crimes other than terrorism-related offences and waging war”.

Conclusion

• The way forward lies in striking a balance. Measures promoting transparency, such as clear guidelines for considering petitions and a defined timeframe for decisions, could enhance public trust. Additionally, ensuring legal representation for mercy petition applicants would strengthen the process.
• Ultimately, the mercy petition system serves a vital purpose in the Indian justice system. By acknowledging its strengths and addressing its shortcomings, India can ensure a more humane and effective application of this extraordinary power..