Centre’s Power for Land Acquisition for Highway: SC | 09 Dec 2020

Why in News

Recently, the Supreme Court (SC) has upheld notifications issued under the National Highways Act, 1956, for acquisition of land for construction of the Chennai-Krishnagiri-Salem national highway.

• The verdict came on a batch of appeals filed by the Centre and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and few landowners and others. These pleas were filed against the Madras High Court's judgement, holding as “illegal and bad in law” the notifications issued.

Key Points

• Chennai-Krishnagiri-Salem National Highway:
  
  • It is a part of the first phase of the ‘Bharatmala Pariyojna’ project.
    
    • Bharatmala Pariyojna Project stretches across 24,800 km and has an estimated outlay of Rs. 5.35 lakh crore. It seeks to improve the efficiency of freight and passenger movement across the country by bridging critical infrastructure gaps.
  • It is a 277.3-km-long eight-lane greenfield project which aims to cut travel time between the two cities Chennai and Salem by half to about two hours and 15 minutes.
    
    • A greenfield project is one which is not constrained by prior work. It is constructed on unused land where there is no need to remodel or demolish an existing structure.
  • The Project has faced opposition from locals, including farmers, over fears of losing their land, besides environmentalists, who are against felling of trees. It runs through reserve forest and water bodies.
• Supreme Court’s Judgement:
  
  • Centre’s Powers:
    
    • There is nothing in the Constitution which constricts the power of Parliament to make a law for declaring any stretch/section within the State (not being a road or an existing highway) to be a national highway.
    • Provisions in the Constitution unambiguously indicate that the legislative as well as executive power regarding all matters concerning and connected with a highway to be designated as a national highway, vests in Parliament, and the laws to be made by it in that regard.
    • The Central government is free to construct/build a new national highway keeping in mind the obligations it has to discharge under Part IV of the Constitution (Directive Principles of State Policy) for securing a social order and promotion of welfare of the people in the concerned region.
  • Importance of National Highways:
    
    • National highways are the arteries of India’s economy. By its very nomenclature, a national highway is to link the entire country and provide access to all in every remote corner of the country for interaction and to promote commerce and trade, employment and education, including health related services.
      
      • This approach enhances and furthers the federal structure.
    • The availability of a highway in any part of the State paves way for sustainable development and for overall enhancement of human well-being.
  • Other Aspects Related to the Project:
    
    • The Madras High Court had been wrong to quash the acquisition proceedings on the ground that no prior environmental clearance was taken.
      
      • The SC said that the notification is only an expression of interest to acquire the designated land, and no prior environmental clearance was needed before issuing it.
      • Prior environmental clearance under the Environment (Protection) Act and Rules of 1986 is required to be taken before commencement of the “actual construction or building work” of the national highway by the executing agency (NHAI).
    • On complaints about “alterations” in the highway route, the court said changes to the extent of 15% was permissible in a project of such a macro scale.
      
      • Unforeseen concerns like land availability factors related to congestion, reduction of distance, operational efficiency attract such alteration.

Source: IE