7th National Security Strategies Conference 2024 | 25 Sep 2024

Source: TH 

Why in News?

Recently, the Union Home Minister inaugurated the National Security Strategies Conference (NSSC) 2024 in New Delhi. 

• The roadmap to solutions to emerging national security challenges has been discussed with the top police leadership. 
• The top police officers also discussed how to study the issues concerning tribals with a “non-Colonial approach”. 

What are the Key Highlights of the NSSC 2024? 

• About NSSC: It was conceived by the Prime Minister during the DGsP/IGsP Conference with the objective of finding solutions to major national security challenges through discussions amongst a unique mix of senior police leadership.  
• Diversity of Participants: The conference brings together a unique mix of senior police leadership managing national security challenges, young police officers working at the cutting-edge level, and domain experts in specialised fields. 
• DGsP/IGsP Conference Recommendations Dashboard: A new dashboard developed by the National Crime Records Bureau has been launched. 
  • It is designed to aid in the implementation of decisions taken during the annual Directors and Inspectors General of Police conference chaired by the Prime Minister. 
• Focus on Tribal Issues with a Non-Western Approach: The discussion emphasised the need for adopting a non-colonial perspective in addressing the grievances of tribal communities.  
  • The idea is to move away from the Western model of dealing with indigenous populations, which historically stigmatised and marginalised them and emphasis should be given to respect, inclusion, and empowerment rather than control and exclusion. 
• Discussion on Multiple Security Challenges: 
  • Radicalisation of youth via social media particularly focusing on “Islamic and Khalistani radicalization.” 
  • Narcotics and trafficking has become a major concern in internal security, impacting social and economic stability. 
  • Security at non-major ports and fishing harbours which pose significant risks for smuggling and other illegal activities. 
• Emerging Threats and Technological Challenges: The conference explored several emerging security threats. 
  • Fintech Fraud: It emphasised on how financial technologies are being exploited for criminal activities. 
  • Rogue Drones: Countermeasures against rogue drones, used for smuggling and surveillance, were a focal point of the session. 
  • Exploitation of App Ecosystems: Criminals are increasingly using mobile apps for illicit activities.  

How British Colonists Dealt with Tribals in India? 

• Criminal Tribes Act, 1871: During British colonial rule, the Criminal Tribes Act, 1871 classified several tribes as hereditary, habitual criminals. 
  • As per the British, they were naturally inclined to commit minor crimes.  
  • Their alleged likelihood to commit crime at any moment justified blanket surveillance against them at all times. 
• Indian Forest Act, 1865: The act banned many daily practices of tribals, such as cutting wood, grazing cattle, collecting fruits and roots, and fishing. 
  • Tribals were forced to steal wood from the forests, facing bribes from forest guards if caught. 
• Forest Act, 1878: It was more comprehensive than earlier ones.  
  • Forests were categorised as reserved forests, protected forests and village forests which restricted tribals’ access to forests. 
  • Provision was made to impose a duty on timber. 
• Indian Forest Act, 1927: This Act classified forests into three categories namely reserved forests, village forests and protected forests. 
  • In reserved forests, local people are prohibited leading to physical harassment of  tribal communities on their entry. 
• Permanent Settlement (1793): Introduction of permanent settlement in tribal areas abolished the traditional practices of collective and traditional ownership of lands (Khutkutti system).  
  • Exploitation by the outsiders (Dikus) such as police, traders, and moneylenders aggravated the tribals' sufferings. 

How has the Indian Government has Adopted a non-Colonial approach for Tribals? 

• Habitual Offenders Act, 1952: After Independence, the Indian government replaced Criminal Tribes Act, 1871 with the Habitual Offenders Act, 1952. 
  • The communities that were notified as ‘criminal’ under the Criminal Tribes Act, 1871 had become “Denotified Tribes” and no longer considered “born criminals”.  
• National Forest Policy 1952: It recognised tribal symbiotic relationship with the forests and allowed for the protection, preservation and development of forests. 
• Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989: It aims to prevent the commission of offences of atrocities against the members of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) and the Scheduled Tribes (STs).  
  • It mandates the constitution of special courts for hearing cases on atrocities against SCs and STs. 
• Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006: FRA 2006 aims to correct the injustices done to forest-dwelling communities by colonial-era forest laws. 
  • It gives Forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribes (FDST) and other traditional forest dwellers (OTFD) the right to ownership to land farmed by tribals or forest dwellers. 

What Challenges are Still Faced by Tribals? 

• Colonial Legacy of Stigmatisation: Despite the repeal of the "criminal tribes" law in 1952, the stigma associated with tribals persists. 
  • The colonial mindset of excluding tribals and viewing them as unequal to the mainstream population has continued even after Independence. 
• Challenges Faced by Denotified Tribes: Denotified tribes are not scheduled tribes, so they lack legislative protection, making them even more vulnerable. 
• Rising Violence Against Tribals: Data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) indicates a steady rise in such crimes, with incidents increasing from 8,802 cases in 2021 to 10,064 in 2022 ( 14.3% increase).  
  • Madhya Pradesh (30.61%), Rajasthan (25.66%) and Odisha (7.94%) recorded the majority of cases of atrocities against STs. 
• State-Wise Variations in Problems: In Madhya Pradesh, prostitution rackets exploit tribals, while in Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh, counter-insurgency operations against Maoists disproportionately impact tribal populations.  
• Evictions and Displacement: Despite the FRA’s protections, some tribal communities still face eviction from forest lands due to poor enforcement or lack of recognition of their rights. E.g., Eviction of Bodo, Rabha and Mishing tribe from the Orange National Park in Assam.

How to Address Challenges Faced by Tribals? 

• Addressing Historical Stigma: Public awareness campaigns, educational reforms, and media portrayal should challenge stereotypes and promote respect for tribal communities. 
• Enhancing Law Enforcement: Strengthening law enforcement mechanisms, increasing conviction rates, and establishing fast-track courts for crimes against tribals are crucial steps to ensure justice. 
• Effective Implementation of the Forest Rights Act (FRA): Efforts must be made to strengthen the implementation of the FRA at the local level, ensuring that tribals are not unjustly evicted from their lands.  
  • Mechanisms such as land title verification, community involvement in forest management, and legal recourse for displaced tribals should be enhanced.  
• Cultural Preservation: Support initiatives that promote and preserve tribal culture, languages, and traditions, fostering pride and identity. E.g., Adi Mahotsav. 
• Political Representation: Ensure adequate representation of tribal communities in local governance and decision-making bodies to voice their concerns. E.g., Reservation of seats for STs in the Lok Sabha (Article 330), State Legislatures (Article 332) and Panchayats (Article 243) and proper implementation of 5th Schedule of the Constitution.