Right to Privacy | 05 Jan 2022
For Prelims: K.S. Puttaswamy case, Article 21, Various dimensions of Right to privacy.
For Mains: K.S. Puttaswamy case, Right to privacy, Article 21, the Personal Data Protection Bill 2019.
Why in News
Recently, a Judge of the Madras High Court has said that a recent order passed by another judge of the same court, mandating the installation of CCTV cameras inside spas [massage and therapy centres], appears to run counter to the Supreme Court's landmark judgement in K.S. Puttaswamy case (2017).
- In this case, the Supreme Court declared that the right to life and personal liberty guaranteed in Article 21 also implicitly includes a right to privacy.
Key Points
- About:
- Underlying Values: This right to privacy is seen as possessing:
- Inherent value: It is important for every person’s basic dignity.
- Instrumental value: It furthers a person’s ability to live life free of interference.
- Forms of Right to Privacy: The privacy as guaranteed in Article 21 takes several different forms. It includes:
- A right to bodily autonomy,
- A right to informational privacy,
- A right to a privacy of choice.
- Right to Relax: Suspicion that immoral activities are taking place in spas cannot be a reason enough to intrude into an individual’s right to relax, for it intrinsically is part and parcel of his fundamental right to privacy.
- Thus, the installation of CCTV equipment inside premises such as a spa would unquestionably go against a person’s bodily autonomy.
- These are inviolable spaces where the prying eye of the State cannot be allowed to enter.
- Doctrine of Separation of Powers: The reach of the fundamental rights cannot be curtailed by any judicial measure.
- It held that, though no right can be absolute, restrictions can be put in place only by the legislature or the executive.
- Apart from it, the Supreme Court alone can do so in exercise of its power under Article 142.
- Underlying Values: This right to privacy is seen as possessing:
Right to Privacy
- About:
- Generally understood that privacy is synonymous with the right to be let alone.
- The Supreme Court described privacy and its importance in the landmark decision of K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India in 2017.
- The right to privacy is protected as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 and as a part of the freedoms guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution.
- The Puttaswamy judgement holds that the right to privacy is protected as a fundamental constitutional right under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
- Restrictions (as stated in the Judgement):
- The right may be restricted only by state action that passes each of the three tests:
- First, such state action must have a legislative mandate.
- Second, it must be pursuing a legitimate state purpose, and
- Third, it must be proportionate i.e., such state action- both in its nature and extent, must be necessary in a democratic society and the action ought to be the least intrusive of the available alternatives to accomplish the ends.
- The right may be restricted only by state action that passes each of the three tests:
- Step taken by Government: Acknowledging the importance of privacy, the Government has presented the personal Data Protection Bill 2019 in the Parliament.