Understanding International Humanitarian Law: Safeguarding Humanity Amidst Conflict

10 Oct 2024

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), often referred to as the law of armed conflict or the law of war, is a set of rules designed to limit the effects of armed conflict for humanitarian reasons. It seeks to protect those who are not participating in hostilities, such as civilians, medical personnel, and aid workers, while also regulating the means and methods of warfare. This blog aims to delve into the key principles, coverage, importance, challenges, and implementation of IHL, highlighting its critical role in safeguarding humanity during armed conflicts.

What are the Core Principles of International Humanitarian Law?

At its heart, IHL is underpinned by several fundamental principles that guide the conduct of armed forces and protect individuals during conflicts. These principles are essential for ensuring that, even in times of war, humanitarian considerations are prioritised.

Distinction: The principle of distinction requires parties to a conflict to always differentiate between combatants and civilians. This means that attacks must only be directed against military objectives, protecting civilian lives and property. The obligation to distinguish is a cornerstone of IHL and aims to reduce harm to non-combatants.
Proportionality: Proportionality prohibits attacks that would cause excessive civilian harm in relation to the anticipated military advantage. This principle necessitates a careful assessment of potential collateral damage before military operations. The goal is to minimise harm to civilians while allowing for legitimate military actions.
Precaution: IHL requires all parties in a conflict to take feasible precautions to protect civilians and civilian objects. This includes verifying targets and avoiding military operations in densely populated areas. The precautionary measures are crucial for reducing the risk of civilian casualties and damage to civilian infrastructure.
Humanity: The overarching goal of IHL is to minimise suffering and ensure humane treatment for all individuals, regardless of their status in a conflict. This principle underscores the importance of treating everyone with dignity, even in the heat of battle.

What is the Importance of International Humanitarian Law?

The significance of IHL extends beyond legal obligations; it serves crucial humanitarian purposes that protect vulnerable populations and preserve human dignity during armed conflicts. Here are several key aspects of its importance:

Protection of Vulnerable Populations: IHL aims to safeguard those most vulnerable in armed conflicts, including women, children, and the elderly. Special protections exist for children, recognizing their unique needs during conflict. Pregnant women also receive specific protections to ensure their safety and well-being.
- Children: Children are recognized as particularly vulnerable in conflict situations. IHL emphasizes the need to protect them from recruitment into armed forces, sexual violence, and other forms of exploitation. Additionally, provisions are made to ensure their access to education and healthcare during conflicts.
- Women: Women face distinct challenges during armed conflicts, including increased risks of sexual violence and exploitation. IHL mandates protections for women, emphasising the need to prevent gender-based violence and provide necessary healthcare services.
- Elderly and Disabled Persons: Elderly individuals and those with disabilities also require special attention in armed conflicts. IHL encourages parties to ensure that their rights are respected and that they receive appropriate care and assistance.
Preservation of Human Dignity: IHL seeks to uphold human dignity by ensuring humane treatment of all individuals, regardless of their status in a conflict. This commitment to dignity helps foster a sense of humanity even in the most challenging circumstances. It serves as a reminder that, regardless of the circumstances of war, respect for human dignity must prevail.
- Humane Treatment: All individuals must be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction based on race, religion, or political opinion. This principle forms the bedrock of IHL and is crucial for maintaining moral and ethical standards during armed conflicts.
- Access to Justice: Ensuring that victims of violations have access to justice and that perpetrators are held accountable is vital for restoring dignity to those affected by armed conflicts.
Facilitating Humanitarian Assistance: IHL provides a legal framework that allows humanitarian organisations to operate in conflict zones, delivering vital aid and support to affected populations. It establishes safe corridors for aid delivery and mandates the protection of humanitarian workers.
- Safe Corridors: IHL allows for the establishment of safe zones and corridors to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian assistance. These areas must be respected by all parties to the conflict to ensure that aid reaches those in need.
- Protection of Humanitarian Workers: Humanitarian workers play a crucial role in providing assistance during conflicts. IHL mandates their protection, making it a war crime to attack humanitarian personnel or obstruct their work.
Promoting Peace and Security: By regulating the conduct of hostilities, IHL contributes to reducing the brutality of war, promoting accountability, and facilitating post-conflict reconciliation efforts.
- Accountability: IHL emphasises the need for accountability for violations. It provides a legal framework for prosecuting individuals responsible for war crimes and other serious violations. This accountability mechanism is crucial for deterring future violations and promoting respect for the law.
- Reconciliation: Adhering to IHL can facilitate post-conflict reconciliation by fostering trust between conflicting parties and creating conditions conducive to peace.

What does International Humanitarian Law Cover?

Protection of Non-Combatants: One of the primary focuses of IHL is the protection of individuals who are not directly participating in hostilities. The Geneva Conventions, comprising four treaties, regulate the protection and treatment of specific groups during international armed conflicts:
- Wounded and Sick Armed Forces: The first convention protects members of the armed forces who are wounded or sick in the field. It mandates their humane treatment and provides for the care and evacuation of the wounded.
- Wounded, Sick, and Shipwrecked Members at Sea: The second convention extends protections to those in naval warfare, ensuring similar rights and protections for those injured or in distress at sea.
- Prisoners of War: The third convention outlines the treatment and rights of prisoners of war, emphasising humane treatment and judicial guarantees. It prohibits torture, coercion, and inhumane treatment of prisoners.
- Civilians: The fourth convention focuses on the protection of civilians, especially those who find themselves in the hands of a party to the conflict or an occupying power. These individuals, known as “protected persons,” include stateless persons, refugees, and journalists.
Restrictions on Means and Methods of Warfare: IHL imposes restrictions on the means and methods of warfare, regulating weaponry and military tactics. Parties to a conflict are prohibited from using weapons that cause unnecessary suffering or superfluous injury.
- Superfluous Injury and Unnecessary Suffering: IHL explicitly prohibits the use of means and methods of warfare that cause excessive injury or suffering to combatants and civilians alike. This includes bans on certain weapons, such as chemical and biological weapons, which cause indiscriminate harm.
- Cultural Property: Specific protections are granted to cultural property, places of worship, and objects essential for civilian survival, ensuring that military operations do not target or unduly damage these sites.
Special Protections for Vulnerable Groups: Certain groups, including women, children, and persons with disabilities, are afforded additional protections under IHL. The prohibition against “non-adverse” distinction means that tailored measures are required to protect these vulnerable populations.
- Gender-Based Violence: IHL recognizes the need to address gender-based violence and emphasises that parties to a conflict must take effective measures to prevent such acts and protect victims.
- Access to Basic Needs: Special attention must be given to ensuring that vulnerable populations have access to basic needs such as food, water, shelter, and medical care.

What are the Challenges to International Humanitarian Law?

Despite its critical importance, IHL faces several challenges in its application and enforcement:
- Non-State Actors: Modern conflicts often involve non-state actors (e.g., terrorist organisations, insurgent groups) who may not adhere to IHL. This complicates efforts to ensure compliance and accountability.
  - Accountability Issues: Non-state actors often operate outside the bounds of international law, leading to challenges in holding them accountable for violations of IHL.
  - Negotiation Challenges: Engaging with non-state actors in peace negotiations can be complex, especially when they do not recognize or accept the principles of IHL.
- Evolving Warfare: The rise of asymmetric warfare, cyber warfare, and the use of advanced technologies (e.g., drones) raises new questions regarding the application of traditional IHL principles.
  - Cyber Warfare: The increasing reliance on cyber capabilities presents unique challenges for IHL. Determining the applicability of existing principles in cyber warfare is an ongoing area of debate.
  - Drones and Autonomous Weapons: The use of drones and autonomous weapons complicates the application of principles like distinction and proportionality, raising ethical and legal concerns regarding accountability for potential violations.
- Lack of Enforcement Mechanisms: While IHL provides rules, enforcement mechanisms remain weak. States often lack the political will to prosecute violators, leading to impunity for war crimes.
  - Weak International Institutions: International institutions tasked with enforcing IHL, such as the International Criminal Court (ICC), often face political obstacles and limitations in their jurisdiction.
  - State Sovereignty: Issues of state sovereignty can hinder the enforcement of IHL, as states may resist external scrutiny or intervention.
- Geopolitical Interests: Geopolitical considerations can hinder the enforcement of IHL, as states may prioritise strategic alliances over humanitarian obligations.
  - Arms Exports: The ongoing debates over arms exports to countries involved in conflicts where IHL violations are reported highlight the tension between national interests and international humanitarian obligations.
  - Political Will: The political will to enforce IHL often diminishes when it conflicts with national interests, leading to inconsistent application and accountability.

What are the Recent Developments?

Recent international conflicts have highlighted the urgent need for adherence to IHL. Notable examples include:

Israel-Palestine Conflict: The ongoing conflict in Gaza has led to renewed scrutiny of military actions and arms exports. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued provisional measures against Israel for potential violations of the Genocide Convention, urging states to refrain from actions that may contribute to war crimes. Many countries, including the Netherlands, Canada, and Spain, have halted arms exports to Israel in response to concerns about IHL compliance.
Judicial Rulings in India: The dismissal of a public interest litigation (PIL) by the Supreme Court of India, which sought to halt military exports to Israel, raised questions about the judicial system's role in enforcing international humanitarian obligations. The court's rationale emphasised the separation of foreign policy and judicial review, sparking debates about the need for domestic legal frameworks that align with IHL.
International Advocacy: Human rights organisations continue to advocate for stronger enforcement of IHL and accountability for violations. They emphasise the need for states to adopt domestic laws that assess compliance with international norms before approving arms exports.
Legal Gaps in India: The absence of an equivalent to the U.K.’s Export Control Act or EU regulations in Indian law requires an assessment of a country’s compliance with IHL obligations before military exports. While the Indian Foreign Trade Act (1992) and the Weapons of Mass Destruction Act (2005) empower the government to regulate arms exports, there is no explicit requirement to evaluate a recipient state's adherence to IHL. This gap leaves room for potential complicity in international crimes.

What are the Steps Needed to Strengthen Compliance with IHL?

To enhance compliance with IHL and uphold its principles, several measures can be taken:

Amending Domestic Laws: Countries, including India, should revise their domestic legal frameworks to incorporate assessments of IHL compliance when considering arms exports. This would help ensure that military supplies do not contribute to violations of humanitarian norms.
- Export Control Legislation: Implementing comprehensive export control legislation that aligns with IHL can strengthen accountability and deter potential violations.
- Legal Frameworks for Non-State Actors: Developing legal frameworks that address the actions of non-state actors can enhance accountability and promote adherence to IHL principles.
Increasing Awareness and Training: Education and training programs for military personnel, government officials, and legal practitioners can foster a better understanding of IHL and its application in contemporary conflicts.
- Military Training: Incorporating IHL training into military curricula can ensure that armed forces understand their obligations and the importance of adhering to humanitarian principles.
- Public Awareness Campaigns: Engaging the public in discussions about IHL and its significance can foster a culture of accountability and respect for humanitarian norms.
Promoting International Cooperation: Collaborative efforts among states, international organisations, and non-governmental organisations can strengthen the enforcement of IHL and facilitate humanitarian assistance in conflict zones.
- Joint Humanitarian Initiatives: States and NGOs can work together to establish joint initiatives that prioritise the protection of civilians and the delivery of humanitarian aid.
- International Partnerships: Forming international partnerships can enhance the capacity to respond to humanitarian crises and promote compliance with IHL.
Encouraging Accountability: States must commit to prosecuting individuals responsible for IHL violations, sending a clear message that impunity will not be tolerated.
- Support for International Courts: Supporting international courts and tribunals can facilitate accountability for war crimes and serious violations of IHL.
- Strengthening Domestic Judicial Mechanisms: Developing domestic judicial mechanisms that align with IHL can enhance accountability and provide victims with avenues for redress.

Conclusion

International Humanitarian Law is an essential framework that seeks to protect human dignity in times of armed conflict. Its principles of distinction, proportionality, necessity, and humanity serve as guiding lights in the darkest hours of war. As conflicts become increasingly complex, the commitment to uphold and enforce IHL is crucial for promoting peace, security, and the well-being of all individuals affected by conflict. Nations, including India, must prioritise their legal and ethical responsibilities under IHL, ensuring that their actions reflect a commitment to humanity, even amid the ravages of war.

Sources:

Achievers Corner

Prelims

Mains & Interview

Current Affairs

Drishti Specials

Study Material

State PCS

Test Series

Videos

Drishti IAS Blog